Last October, during the throes of the COVID-19 pandemic and its cascading economic downturns, a major federal financial regulator passed a rule that blesses the “rent-a-bank” program where predatory lenders team up to banks to evade government interest rate limits.
Known as the “real lender” rule, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) has given the green light to predatory lenders. It effectively overturns a series of state laws in nearly every state enacted to end abusive payday loans, car titles and installment loans with explosive interest rates of over 100%.
Taking effect in late December 2020, the rule facilitates a system whereby high-cost payday and installment lenders pay a fee to banks for using their name and charter to evade state laws on interest rates by asking the bank to be exempt from these laws for itself.
Ironically, the mission of the OCC is to ensure that national banks and federal savings associations provide fair access to financial services, treat customers fairly, and comply with applicable laws and regulations. Yet this OCC regulation helps predatory lenders evade state laws and harms consumers in direct violation of the agency’s stated mission.
To more accurately describe how bank charters were used to sell predatory loans, consumer advocates refer to the rule change as a “bogus lender” because the real lender is not a bank, but the non-bank lender. predator.
OCC’s misguided regulation has also sparked a swarm of consumer advocacy from various spheres of influence, but united in opposition.
For example, 138 academics from 44 states and the District of Columbia have expressed their opposition to leasing a bank. The group included law professors from prestigious institutions such as Cornell, Columbia, Georgetown, Harvard, Howard, Notre Dame and Northwestern. In a letter dated April 20, the professors wrote in part, “If this rule is not rescinded, it will be catastrophic for countless Americans as they attempt to recover from this period of unprecedented health and economic disaster.
A day later, on April 21, a bipartisan group of 25 state attorneys general also called for corrective action.
“During an unprecedented economic downturn, provoked and exacerbated by Covid-19, the OCC seeks to expand the availability of exploitative loans that trap borrowers in an endless cycle of debt,” the attorneys general wrote. “We urge Congress to use its powers under the Congressional Review Act to overturn the OCC’s true lender rule and protect the right of sovereign states, as well as the ability of an independent judiciary,” to protect our citizens from bank rental programs designed to work. end revolves around essential consumer protections.
The Congressional Review Act (CRA) allows the rules to be repealed with simple majority votes in the House and Senate before going to the president for signature. In late March, Illinois Representative Jesus “Chuy” García and Maryland Senator Chris Van Hollen introduced joint resolutions providing for Congress disapproval under the CRA. Everyone is waiting for the votes on the ground which should take place from mid-May to the end of May to comply with the deadline for action of the law within the 60 legislative days allotted to him.
Other organizations active in the regulatory reversal effort include: Conference of State Bank Supervisors, Credit Union National Association, Cooperative Baptist Fellowship, National Baptist Convention, USA, Inc., National Association of Federal Credit Unions and Veterans Education Success.
Consumer advocacy to overturn the “bogus lender” rule peaked on April 28 at a hearing was convened by the US Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. The opening statement by the chair of the committee, Senator Sherrod Brown, set the tone and purpose of the forum.
“Like so many things we do, it comes down to a question: which side are you on?” asked Senator Brown. “You can side with online payday lenders who brag about their creativity by avoiding the law and finding new ways to prey on workers and their families. Or we can stand up for families and small businesses, as well as state attorneys general and state legislatures that have said “enough” and are trying to protect themselves and their states from predatory lending programs. ”
Witness testimony at the hearing made it clear the concerns, as well as the choices, before Congress.
The Rev. Dr. Frederick C. Haynes III, senior pastor of Friendship West Baptist Church in Dallas, represented not only his congregation of 12,000 members, but also Faith for Just Lending, a coalition of Christian denominations that believe in fair financial practices and equitable respect human dignity.
“For decades, banks have used cards to deny loans to communities of color and now they are using cards to serve as loan sharks to those same communities,” Haynes said. “That the OCC establish a rule giving predatory lenders a way to charge interest of 200-400% and more, even in states that have fought hard to stop this predation with an interest rate cap of 36. % – it is indeed obscene, and as we put it in my community of faith, sinful and demonic.
Lisa Stifler, director of state policy at the Center for Responsible Lending (CRL), reviewed her consumer advocacy for a decade and addressed lenders who benefit from the rule and their actions.
“How the OCC rule works is already clear, as OCC-regulated banks allow some of the most predatory loans in the market,” Stifler noted. “For over a year, Stride Bank has helped payday lender CURO pilot installment loans of up to $ 5,000 with rates up to 179% Annual Percentage Rate (APR). This exorbitantly priced loan is illegal in almost all states. Still, the OCC rule calls on predatory lenders to evade state laws by paying a bank to put its name on the paperwork. “
“Another bank regulated by the OCC, Axos Bank, leases its name and charter to the predatory small business lender World Business Lenders (WBL),” Stifler continued. “WBL loans vary in the tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars, and have carry rates of up to 268%. Often secured by the borrower’s personal residence, these loans cause small business owners to lose their homes.
North Carolina Attorney General Josh Stein shared his state’s experience with leasing a bank before warning senators of the looming threat to the nation if timely action were not taken. not taken.
Perhaps the shortest summary of the day is President Brown’s.
“Some of the issues before this committee are complicated, they divide people, there are thorny nuances to consider,” noted the Ohio senator. “He’s not one of them. It’s simple: let’s stop predatory lenders instead of encouraging them.
Hopefully it is that simple when senators on both sides of the aisle need to vote and have the opportunity to stand up for consumers.
Charlene Crowell is a senior member of the Center for Responsible Lending.